Health and Wellbeing

Life expectancy 

Why is this important?

Life expectancy and healthy life expectancy are extremely important summary measures of overall population health. The Marmot Review, Fair Society, Healthy Lives, demonstrates clear and significant links between avoidable differences in health outcomes and deprivation, where people experiencing multiple deprivation not only living shorter lives, but spend a greater portion of their shorter lives with a disability or in poor health. As a Marmot city, Coventry has adopted and embedded the principles of Marmot, tackling the social conditions that can lead to health inequalities, and working to improve the areas in which people are born, grow, live, work and age. 

What is the local picture? How does it compare?

There are health inequalities across Coventry whereby areas with higher levels of deprivation tend to have lower life expectancy. Bell Green and WEHM are examples of this. Life expectancy is a statistic giving a high-level picture of the health of Coventry residents and should be used with care in understanding likely life spans for people; excess deaths due to the COVID-19 pandemic will have a negative impact on life expectancy statistics but this may not have a permanent impact. Whilst this data includes 2020 and the pandemic will have undoubtedly affected mortality statistics, life expectancy increases had already stalled before 2020.  

Life expectancy (LE) in Bell Green and WEHM for both males and females is lower than the rest of the city overall and is particularly low for males living here. The data in the following table presents life expectancy at birth for both females and males across four areas: Bell Green, Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM), Coventry, and England. Below is a summary of the life expectancy data:

  Table: Life expectancy at birth 2016-2020 by MSOA, the most up to date figures available at local level  

Area name

Life expectancy at birth (2016 to 2020)

Female

male

Bell Green

 

80.1

74.2

Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM)

79.0

73.5

Coventry

82.1

78.1

England

83.2

79.5

Source:  The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities 2022, Crown Copyright.

The data shows that the life expectancy at birth statistics for Coventry are below the national average for males and females, and for both Bell Green and the WEHM area the figures are notably below the city average, indicating poorer than average levels of health. Life expectancy is particularly low in the WEHM area, amongst the areas in the city with the lowest levels. While life expectancy for males is lower than for females in all areas, it is particularly low for males in Bell Green and WEHM, the gap with the city average is higher for males here.

Health inequalities across the city mean that people in more deprived parts of the city, like Bell Green and WEHM, not only live shorter lives, but also spend a greater proportion of their shorter lives in poor health. Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an indication of when people in an area start to suffer poor health on average. The gap between healthy life expectancy at birth (HLE) and life expectancy at birth (LE) is referred to as the ‘window of need’. While this gap in Coventry is bigger than that for England as a whole, for people in the Bell Green and WEHM area it is even bigger, particularly so for females- it is higher in the WEHM area compared to Bell Green. The window of need for females in the WEHM area areas covers a third of their expected Life Expectancy (35%) compared to a quarter (25%) in Coventry or just over a fifth (22%) nationally. It is wider for females than males, on average women spend more of their lives in poor health, mainly because total life expectancy is longer for females than males in Bell Green & WEHM.  

HLE and ‘window of need’ figures for Bell Green and WEHM compared to Coventry and England, the most recent data available, are presented in the table below.

Table: Life expectancy (LE) at birth & healthy life expectancy (HLE) at birth 2009-2013 by MSOA*.

Area

Healthy life expectancy at birth (2009-2013)

Life expectancy at birth (2009-2013)

Window of need (2009-2013)

Female

 Male

Female

 Male

Female

Male

 

Bell Green

55.7

54.6

78.2

74.6

22.5

20.0

Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM)

53.5

53.4

79.6

72.7

26.1

19.3

Coventry

61.8

61.2

82.1

77.9

20.3

16.7

England

64.8

63.5

83.0

79.1

18.2

15.6

Source:  The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Crown Copyright.

*The most up to date figures available at local level for healthy life expectancy, data for LE is presented for the same period to accurately calculate the ‘window of need’. The data for 2016-20 LE in the table above is the best to use to understand LE alone. This is the most up to date data at MSOA level, for more up to date information for Coventry City as a whole please see our Citywide profile

Premature mortality (deaths amongst residents aged under 75 years) is considerably higher in Bell Green and WEHM than the city and national average. Premature mortality rates are significantly higher than the city average in Bell Green and WEHM for all major causes, they are amongst the highest rates of all areas in the city.

Premature mortality is defined as deaths amongst residents aged under 75 years of age.  

The following table shows age standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) for deaths aged under 75, an SMR of 100 represents a mortality rate the same as the national average given the age structure of the population. It illustrates how big the gap is between the areas of Bell Green and WEHM and Coventry. It is particularly high amongst residents of Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM) for causes considered ‘preventable’; a ‘preventable’ death is one which is considered as avoidable through public health or primary care interventions. 

Table: Premature mortality rates (deaths aged under 75) by major causes 2016-2020, by MSOA

Causes of deaths. Standardised Mortality Ratio (SMR*)

Bell Green

WEHM

 

Coventry

England 

All causes 

176.2

187.7

 

116.9

100.0 

All cancer 

160.8

153.4

 

108.7 

100.0 

Circulatory disease 

192.9

203.7

 

122.1 

100.0 

Causes considered preventable**  

177.0

224.1

 

120.1 

100.0 

Source: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, produced from Office for National Statistics (ONS) data. 

*SMRs are age standardised death rates that allow mortality rates for areas with different age structures to be compared. ** Deaths which could be avoided by public health or primary care interventions.

What else is happening? What else can be done?

Preventable deaths can be avoided by addressing the social conditions that lead to poor health, such as people’s prospects and opportunities; housing and environment; as well as behavioural and lifestyle changes. These are explored throughout this JSNA.

Health protection 

Why is this important?

Health Protection is a term used to cover a set of activities within public health. It is defined as protecting individual, groups and populations from single cases of infectious disease, incidents and outbreaks, and non-infectious environmental hazards such as chemicals and radiation. Monitoring health protection coverage helps to identify possible drops in immunity before levels of disease rise.

What is the local picture? How does it compare?

The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic changed all our lives and had impacts on a global scale. Like every area, many people from Bell Green and WEHM contracted COVID-19 during the pandemic, a total of 6,319 cases were recorded for residents of the area between March 2020 and 31st May 2022. This is out of a total population of 18,978 from the 2021 Census, a case rate of 333.0 per 1,000 residents, similar to the overall city rate for this period of 324.8. We should be mindful when comparing the area’s case rate to other areas, these official cases do not represent all cases of course, not all people who had COVID-19 in this period will have taken a test or reported its result and some people were asymptomatic so were unaware they had the virus. Therefore, these figures do not count total prevalence, and it is difficult to conclude from differing case rates, it may be a result of different testing and reporting rates.     

Many people suffer from ongoing symptoms, from ‘long COVID’; while we don’t know how many local residents suffer from this and if it is higher or lower than average, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) estimated the prevalence of self-reported long COVID at 2.92% of all people living in private households in the UK in March 2023.   

COVID-19 mortality rates amongst Bell Green and WEHM residents were around average for Coventry, lower than might have been expected based on the deprivation and diversity levels in the population.  Death rates associated with COVID-19 were nationally higher in areas of higher deprivation and amongst many ethnic minority groups, so if Bell Green and WEHM were to follow this trend we might expect deaths rates here to be higher than average, but they were not overall, although they were a little higher in Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM) than they were in Bell Green. In the three years 2020 to 2022, 32 residents in Bell Green and WEHM died with the underlying cause being given as COVID-19, out of a total number of 448 deaths from all causes. We can compare mortality rates between areas using Standardised Mortality Ratios (SMRs), a measure used to compare the observed number of deaths in a specific population with the number of deaths that would be expected based on the age and sex-specific rates in a standard population. It helps to assess whether the mortality rate in a particular area or population is higher or lower than expected, after accounting for differences in age distributions of the population; this is important because death rates from COVID-19, and from all causes, are much higher in older people and some areas have older populations that others. The SMR for COVID-19 deaths spanning the period from 2020 to 2022 was 98.2 for Bell Green, while across the WEHM area it was 112.0. An SMR of 100 indicates a mortality rate the same as the England average after adjusting for the age profile of the population, so the COVID-19 mortality rate was lower than the national average in Bell Green and slightly higher than average in the WEHM area. Both Bell Green and WEHM rank in the middle compared to all Coventry areas, there are many Coventry areas with lower levels of deprivation that had higher COVID-19 mortality rates.

Coventry delivered hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 vaccines that protected many from severe illness or death and protected the health service. However, many remain unvaccinated, and vaccination rates are slightly lower than the city average in Bell Green and WEHM. There is a strong link with deprivation with increasingly lower rates of vaccine coverage in areas of higher deprivation, and some ethnic minority groups have lower rate; so, Coventry’s rates are lower than the national average and Bell Green and WEHM, an area of higher deprivation and some ethnic minority groups being populous here, has relatively low COVID-19 vaccination rates compared to the city average.

By December 2023, 12,333 Bell Green and WEHM residents had received their 1st dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, an uptake of 66.6% of residents aged 12+, lower than Coventry at 68.1%. 11,380 have received their 2nd dose, an uptake of 61.5% lower than Coventry at 63.3%. These uptake rates may be underreported due to the population data used by the NHS, but still the Bell Green and WEHM uptake rate is lower than the Coventry average, which in turn is lower than the national average. Vaccination rates are higher amongst older groups, although still lower than the Coventry average in Bell Green and WEHM amongst older people; for local residents aged 65+ the coverage in the area is 88.2% for dose 1 compared to 93.1% for Coventry and 87.1% for dose 2 compared to 92.4% for Coventry.

For people aged 65+ vaccination rates are similar between Bell Green and WEHM, dose 1 coverage at 88.7% and 87.8% respectively. Amongst all aged 12+ there is a slight difference between areas, dose 1 coverage at 68.4% and 65.3% respectively indicating lower uptake in WEHM amongst younger age groups compared to Bell Green.

The pandemic had many impacts, not all directly on residents’ physical health. The restrictions due to the pandemic and the lockdowns, may have had an impact on different aspects of health, not least mental health. The ONS conduct an annual survey where they ask people about their personal wellbeing, it indicates increased levels of anxiety amongst Coventry’s population during the pandemic. The % who gave a score indicating high levels of anxiety increased from 20.6% in 2019/20 to 26.9% in 2020/21

Responses to questions in the Coventry Household Survey 2022 give indications as to the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on people's lives, a sample of Coventry people were asked how worried they were about the impact of COVID-19 on their financial situation, their diet, their mental health, their physical health, and their feeling of loneliness; on a scale of 0-10, those scoring 7 or higher are classed as ‘worried’ in the statistics quoted below.  

In Bell Green and WEHM, Over half of survey respondents (55%) from Bell Green and WEHM, notably higher than the Coventry average of 38%, 46% worried about their physical health (vs. 31% city average), 36% about their diet (vs. 22%), 42% about loneliness (vs. 28%), and 56% about their financial situation (vs. 40%), showing a greater negative impact compared to the rest of Coventry.

The survey highlights the widespread impact of COVID-19 on various aspects of life in Bell Green and WEHM, both areas perform lower than the city average, with individuals from WEHM being particularly adversely affected.  46% said they were worried about the impact on their physical health, higher than the Coventry average of 31%; 36% said they were worried about the impact the pandemic had on their diet, higher than the Coventry average 22%; 42% said they were worried about the impact on their feelings of loneliness, higher than the Coventry average 28%; and  56% said they were worried about the impact the pandemic had on their financial situation, higher than the Coventry average 40%.

There are some indications that mental ill health is more prevalent than the average for Coventry in Bell Green and WEHM. The proportion of this area's adults diagnosed with depression according to GP registers in 2021/22 is higher than the city average (11.9%) and England average (12.7%).Using the data from all adult patients registered at the individual GP practices located in the area, we can get an approximate idea of prevalence amongst Bell Green and WEHM residents by looking at rates quoted form the individual GP practices located in the area, and they indicate that the proportion is between 2 and 5 percentage points higher here, amongst the highest rates across the city.
As part of the Household Survey 2022, a sample of resident were asked seven questions about their mental wellbeing, part of the short ‘Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale' (SWEMWBS). They were asked how often recently they have been feeling: optimistic; useful; relaxed; dealing with problems well; thinking clearly; feeling close to others; able to make up their mind. Their responses are scored and aggregated into a single score. Using this measure indicates that a higher-than-average proportion of respondents from Bell Green and WEHM gave responses that created a score indicating relatively low mental wellbeing; 24% scored less than 18 compared to 15% for Coventry overall. 

As is the case for Coventry overall, Bell Green and WEHM uptake rates for several different childhood vaccinations fall short of the desired threshold of 95%. To get a picture of uptake rates amongst children living in Bell Green and WEHM we look at uptake percentages for 2021/22 across many childhood vaccinations amongst patients registered at GP practices located in and near the area. Uptake rates vary between practices and are different depending on the vaccine type and age of child, but overall, for most vaccines fewer than 95% of children have received the vaccine. 

Summarising across all local practices, the data indicates that uptake rates for four vaccines for one year olds were around average for Coventry, ranging from 85.9% to 94.9%, whereas across Coventry rates ranged from 88.8% to 93.4%. For a group of four vaccines for which we have data for two years olds, rates across local practices ranged from 86.1% to 95.0%, overall slightly better than the city average ranging from 85.7% and 87.2%. For three vaccines for five year olds, a vaccine for DTaP/IPV/Hib and the recommended two doses of the MMR vaccine, rates across local practices ranged from 82.8% to 97.1%, overall slightly better than the city average ranging from 83.3% and 92.9%.

Vaccination rates for key cohorts of people eligible to receive the annual seasonal Flu vaccine are overall lower than the city average in Bell Green and WEHM. Flu Vaccines help protect against the main types of flu virus circulating and are offered to a range of at-risk groups of people including children, people aged 65 and over and pregnant women. Vaccination rates vary between the GP practices, the table below shows the range of uptake rates for each cohort across the practices local to Bell Green and WEHM. It shows that flu vaccination rates in all eligible cohorts are lower than the city and national rates.

The vaccine uptake rates for this area’s GPs, for Coventry overall and England for 2022/23 can be seen in the table below.

Table: Flu vaccine uptake rates 2022/23 by cohort amongst people registered at local GP practices - % of eligible population receiving the vaccine

Area

Aged 2 years to under 4 years

Aged 4 years to under 11 years

All 65 Plus

All Pregnant Women

Under 65 at-risk only

 
 

Bell Green and WEHM Area (range)

21.6-29.5%

31.2-39.2%

70.7-74.2%

23.1-31.9%

39.3-46.1%

 

Coventry

31.1%

40.5%

78.1%

33.5%

46.1%

 

England

40.1%

55.5%

82.8%

43.4%

55.3%

 

Source: ImmForm, UK Health Security Agency

HIV remains an important public health concern in Coventry, and the Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM) area has a rate amongst the highest in the city. In 2021, the diagnosed HIV prevalence rate in 2021 was 3.2 per 1,000 compared to 2.3 per 1,000 in England, making Coventry the 32nd highest prevalence out of 150 local authority areas. When comparing diagnosed HIV prevalence per 1,000 population aged 15 to 59 years, WEHM exhibits a high rate exceeding 10 per 1,000. In contrast, Bell Green falls between 2 to 5 per 1,000, representing an intermediate level of prevalence. The map below illustrates diagnosed HIV prevalence rates in 2021 by Coventry area (MSOA), WEHM being among the three areas of the city with the highest rates, those areas shaded in the darkest green colour. The rate for Bell Green is around average for Coventry, shown in a mid-green colour.

Map: Diagnosed HIV prevalence among people of all ages in Coventry by MSOA, 2021

Hiv prevalence

Source: UKHSA HIV and AIDS Reporting System (HARS)

Despite a falling trend, teenage conception rates in Coventry remain higher than average, and rates are higher than the city average in Bell Green and WEHM, perhaps among the highest rate of all Coventry neighbourhoods. In 2021, there were 18.6 conceptions per 1,000 people under the age of 18 for Coventry overall, higher than the England average at 13.1. Data for geographies smaller than Coventry overall are only available at ward level, not specifically for Bell Green or the WEHM area; however, the wards in which Bell Green is located, Longford, and in which the WEHM area is located (Henley), are shown to have the highest rates in the city, amongst the 3 out of the 18 Coventry wards with the highest rates in the city.

Map: Under-18s conception in Coventry by ward, compared to Coventry average: three-year period between 2018 - 20

U18s conception by ward

Source: data sourced from Conception Statistics, England and Wales, ONS

What else is happening? What else can be done?

Ensuring communities understand and trust public health messages, and that they are accessible and culturally appropriate is vital. Coventry has a very diverse and active voluntary and community sector with many small and well-connected groups, it is also blessed with many community leaders and “go to” people in local neighbourhoods. During the pandemic the Community Resilience Team created Community Messengers who consisted of existing faith, voluntary and community networks in the city. The number of messengers has now grown to 320. The messengers perform two main functions: -

  • they help to disseminate into their community the “stay safe” messages.
  • they collect and feedback community intelligence which is then used to influence a number of things such as improving our communication materials, focusing our interventions and deploying our local
    teams of COVID-19 advisors.

Young people were included through a partnership with The Positive Youth Foundation, a charity that supports young people in the Coventry area (and who chair the Coventry Youth Partnership), and a series of focus groups held with young people and the council’s communications team helped the development of
specific messaging for young people, including several videos.

Community members now have a platform and a chance to participate directly in shaping how the council and communities engage with each other. This helps to facilitate a community-led response to communications and messaging surrounding several topics.

There is increasing recognition of the key role that places and communities play in our health. Community groups are best placed to address health challenges, because they are trusted and have the networks understanding and legitimacy to do so. Health and care providers need to shift to an ‘enabling’ leadership style, supporting communities to maintain their health and wellbeing by pooling engagement resources and helping to build capacity by sharing skills and facilities with the communities we serve. The One Coventry Plan is designed to work with our communities to ensure that they can address their health needs and to reduce inequalities.

A community-informed and culturally competent approach to healthcare is essential to increasing screening and vaccination rates. Asylum seekers and refugees typically have worse health than the wider migrant and UK-born population. During migration they are vulnerable to environmental threats – e.g., trafficking, and sexual exploitation – and may have experienced gender-based violence – e.g., torture, sexual violence, FGM, and conflict - that lead to health problems. They, and other newly arrived communities, can also spend long periods of their journey with limited access to healthcare which presents challenges in the form of poorly-managed long-term conditions – e.g., diabetes, and hypertension – and untreated communicable diseases such as TB, HIV and STIs. Newly arrived communities are at increased risk of poor mental health too potentially suffering with anxiety, PTSD, and depression. Therefore, newly arrived communities need healthcare on arrival and information and guidance about the NHS, what services are available, and about their health care rights. The impact of language and cultural barriers cannot be understated so services should be culturally appropriate, and trauma informed.

Building on existing health and wellbeing infrastructures having a collaborative partnership approach, bringing together residents’ experience and partners’ skills and assets, should be taken to strengthen health and wellbeing in communities. The Coventry & Warwickshire Sexual Health Hub is a new service that will operate from a main base in the West Orchards Shopping Centre, three high street sites in Warwickshire and a number of outreach locations across the area including Harmony and Moat House Family Hubs. The service is delivered by HCRG, which currently operates the Walk-In Centre and Anchor and Meridian GP practices. The Hub replaces separate sexual health services operated by CWPT in Coventry and George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust in Warwickshire following a joint procurement between the Council, County Council and NHS England and will deliver a range of testing and treatment services for sexually transmitted infections and contraception services, including a condom distribution scheme. It will also deliver treatment for HIV. HCRG will work alongside the Terence Higgins Trust to improve outreach and help engage with communities.

Demand and access

Why is this important?

The demand for health and care services is expected to increase as the city’s population grows and ages. To manage this growth there is a need to shift the emphasis to proactive and preventative care. This means ensuring people have better general health regardless of where they live, requiring fewer visits to hospital and shorter stays if they need inpatient care; and remodelling urgent and emergency and planned care so that it can cater to the expected increase in demand.

What is the local picture? How does it compare?

The access to GPs is relatively good for residents of the Bell Green and Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM), around average for Coventry overall.  Wood End Health Centre, Henley Green Health Centre and Bell Green Medical Centre are the main GP facilities that serves the area. Many residents can reach a GP within a 3-minute walk (the dark green areas in the map below), and a significant proportion within a 12-minute walk. However, residents in the northernmost part of the WEHM area, parts of Wood End and around Alderman’s Green, experience less favourable access, as they live more than 15 minutes away on foot from their nearest GP.

Map: Locations of GP practices around the area of Bell Green and WEHM, with walking distances highlighted

Gp locations bellgreen and wehm

Data source: Shape Place, Department of Health & Social Care

While proximity to GP practices is reasonably good in this area, the ratio of GPs per capita of the population is a little lower than the average for the city overall. Another way of understanding access to primary health care in the area is to summarise the total GP resource available at the three practices located in the area. The number of staff including doctors, nurses and other direct patient care staff totals amounts to an estimated rate of 10.2 direct patient care staff per 10,000 patients, a little lower than the Coventry average of 11.0; and 7.7 full time equivalent (FTE) direct patient care staff per 10,000 patients compared to 8.3 across Coventry overall.

Map: Locations of pharmacies around the area of Bell Green and WEHM, with walking distances highlighted

Locations of pharmacies bellgreen and wehm

Data source: Shape Place, Department of Health & Social Care

Proximity to pharmacies is relatively good.  There are four main pharmacies that serve the area, namely Henley Green Pharmacy, Henley Road Pharmacy, Lloyds Pharmacy, and Wood End Pharmacy. They are shown on the map above. Serving as crucial hubs for medication distribution and consultation services within the community, most residents of Bell Green and WEHM can conveniently reach a pharmacy within a 15-minute walk, although there are some parts in WEHM (northernmost part of Wood End) that are slightly further away. The dark green areas are within a 5-minute walk to a pharmacy, the light green area represents 15-minute walk.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspect GP practices, all of those in the area that have an inspection result have an assessment of ‘Good’.  We can understand satisfaction with GPs in Coventry by examining responses to the national GP patient survey by Coventry patients annually between 2019 and 2023. It shows that satisfaction levels are lower than average in GP practices local to Bell Green and WEHM. Like for the trend for all Coventry GPs overall, satisfaction levels reduced between 2021 and 2023. The following describes the results across four practices in and near the area, for Wood End Health Centre, Henley Green Health Centre, Bell Green Medical Centre and Longford Primary Care Centre.

In the 2023 survey, when asked ‘Overall, how would you describe your experience of your GP practice?’ Only 58% of respondents from the above GPs said their experience of their GP practice is good or very good, down from 71% in 2021 and notably lower than the city’s 2023 rate of 71%.

When asked ‘Generally, how easy is it to get through to someone at your GP practice on the phone?  Only 43% of respondents felt it was easy, notably lower than the city overall at 59% and a reduction from 53% in 2021.

On a third question, only 45% of respondents registered at practices local to Bell Green and WEHM (listed above) rated themselves as satisfied with the general practice appointment times available to them, again notably worse than satisfaction with this question across all Coventry GPs at 58%.  Like with the other two questions, results deteriorated from the 2021 survey when 53% from Bell Green and WEHM GPs said they satisfied.

What else is happening? What else can be done?

A social gradient approach focusing on people’s prospects and opportunities, housing and environment and lifestyle factors can help improve outcomes, reduce inequality and reducing premature mortality.

The citywide JSNA identified that a culturally competent approach that recognises and makes best use of the assets of the city’s diverse communities is essential. This includes working with local community and religious groups to encourage take-up of vaccination, diagnosis and screening programmes

Health visitors can help support residents to meet their health and care needs – and reduce avoidable demand on A&E. Health visitors are very active in the area, and having support within the community made them feel more at ease. Having different support groups has encouraged socialisation and is seen as a good way for people to meet other people in similar situations to themselves. Further work can be done with the health visiting service, perhaps, including out of hours service, will help people manage their own health problems – without needing to attend hospital.

As part of the Adult Social Care Service, the council are working more closely with other organisations to improve the outcomes for adults. The Improving Lives programme is a partnership programme, led by Coventry and Warwickshire Integrated Care System, bringing together University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust and the Council to work as one service. It aims to enhance patient experiences, prevent hospital admissions, and improve hospital discharge processes. The program focuses on effective care through three sub-programs: Interfaces, Hospital Processes at UHCW, and One Coventry Integrated Team. Its key goals are to promote independent living and simplify care delivery through partner collaboration.

Working together in partnership is vital to delivering services to residents. The Working Together Group; an alliance of CWPT, VSCE, and Primary Care in Coventry and Warwickshire, aims to strengthen partnership working within the voluntary, community, faith and not for profit social enterprise sector.

Lifestyles

Why is this important?

Individual behaviours, such as eating enough fruits and vegetables, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity can affect health. These lifestyle behaviours are strongly influenced by the environment in which people live. For example, people living in a ‘food desert’, with limited access to affordable and healthy food, are more likely to eat unhealthily; an unsafe environment is likely to discourage people from walking or cycling; and social and cultural influences, including friendship groups, advertising and media, play an important role in determining people’s lifestyles.

These lifestyle risk factors – poor diet, physical inactivity, excessive alcohol consumption and smoking – are all linked to ill health and premature death. Having a combination of the risk factors contributes to greater ill health. People facing poorer social circumstances are more at risk of having multiple risk factors, exacerbating avoidable differences in health.

What is the local picture? How does it compare?

What else is happening?

The prevalence of smoking is higher than average amongst residents of Bell Green and WEHM. In the 2022 Household Survey 15% of adult residents said that they currently smoked, compared to a city average of 11%. However, as it has been across the city overall, smoking rates in this area have fallen, in the 2018 Household Survey the percentage of residents reporting that they currently smoke was 24%.

Furthermore, the prevalence of e-cigarette usage in both Bell Green and WEHM (Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm) is reported at 4% of adult residents, compared to the citywide average of 7%.

Alcohol is causing disproportionate harm to health in Bell Green and WEHM. Alcohol consumption appears to be lower than the city average, but the rate of hospital admissions for alcohol related conditions is amongst the worst in Coventry. In terms of alcohol consumption, responses to the Household Survey 2022 indicate that fewer people than average drink alcohol.  Only 13% of respondents from Bell Green and WEHM said they drink alcohol on at least 2 days per week typically compared to the Coventry average of 25%. Amongst those who drink, 25% in Bell Green and WEHM report consuming more than 2-3 units of alcohol on two or more days in a typical week, while the corresponding figure for Coventry is 24%.

The number of hospital admissions where alcohol consumption is considered a contributing factor when measured using a Standardised Admission Rate (SAR) is amongst the highest of all areas in Coventry in both Bell Green and the WEHM area. Using the broad definition of conditions the rate in Bell Green was 200.5, indicating admission rates at double the national average rate after adjusting for the age structure of the population, 100 representing the England average, and 180.0 for the WEHM area. For the narrow definition of alcohol attributable conditions, a more specific subset of health conditions and diseases that are directly and primarily caused by alcohol consumption, Bell Green and WEHM had rates of 198.8 and 175.0 respectively.

Table: Rates of admissions to hospital due to alcohol related conditions (defined in two ways, broadly and narrowly due to alcohol) by place of residence, 2016/17 to 2020/21

Hospital admission rates – alcohol related

Hospital Standardised Admission Ratios (SARs)

Bell Green

WEHM

Coventry

Hospital admissions for alcohol attributable conditions (Broad definition)

200.5

180.0

134.9

Hospital admissions for alcohol attributable conditions (Narrow definition)

198.8

175.0

132.8

Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) NHS Digital

The importance of eating healthy food remains well recognised by most residents, but there are indications that some aspects of diet are poorer in this area overall, although it is a mixed picture. 91% of respondents to the Household Survey 2022 from Bell Green and WEHM agreed that it was important to eat healthily, similar to the response from across Coventry overall at 93%. 11% of residents said they eat the recommended five portions of fruits and vegetables daily, compared to the citywide average of 21%. 73% agreed that they eat breakfast every day compared to the Coventry average of 78% and 75% agreed that they had everything they need in the kitchen to cook compared to the Coventry average of 81%.

The data also suggests that residents in this area may be more conscious of pricing when making food purchases. 74% of respondents from Bell Green and WEHM agreed that price is the most important factor when buying food, compared to 66% across Coventry overall.

Overall, levels of physical activity amongst adults in Bell Green and WEHM residents are around average for Coventry, as indicated by responses to the Coventry Household Survey 2022. 11% of Bell Green respondents said that they do not take part in any everyday physical activity at all (things such as active travel or gardening) the same as the Coventry average. When it comes to engaging in active recreation, (things such as recreational walking or cycling), 25% of those from Bell Green and WEHM said they do not take part in any, again like the Coventry average of 24%. Engagement in more intense physical activity may be less prevalent here, 51% of respondents said they did not take part in any sports, a lower participation rate than Coventry overall (41%)

While the survey indicates that the number of residents who are completely inactive in Bell Green is not particularly low, 10% saying they took part in no everyday activity; a relatively high proportion of Bell Green residents said they took part in no active recreation, 37%, and in no sport, 68%.

Using the latest National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP) data or the 3 years covering 2019/20 to 2021/22, the prevalence of childhood obesity is higher than average in this area, higher than average at age 4-5 and at age 10-11 in the WEHM area, and higher than average at age 10-11 in Bell Green. The prevalence of obesity in children at reception age (including severe obesity) is 9.7% in Bell Green, 16.2% in WEHM, and 10.8% across Coventry overall. This indicates that obesity rates are notably higher in WEHM compared to Bell Green and the city average at the reception age level. The data indicates that the area’s rate of obesity increases in line with that of the city between the ages of 5 and 11 i.e. children are becoming increasingly obese as they get older. For Year 6 children (aged 10-11), the prevalence of obesity (including severe obesity) is 30.4% in Bell Green, 30.6% in WEHM, and 24.8% % across Coventry overall. This data suggests that both Bell Green and WEHM have significantly higher rates of obesity among Year 6 children compared to the city average.

Prevalence of obesity (including severe obesity), 3-years data combined, 2019 to 2020, to 2021 to 2022  

 

Area Name

Reception: Prevalence of obesity (including severe obesity) 

Year 6: Prevalence of obesity (including severe obesity) 

 
 
 

Bell Green

9.7%

30.4%

 

Wood End, Henley Green & Manor Farm (WEHM)

16.2%

30.6%

 

Coventry 

10.8%

24.8%

 

England 

9.9%

21.6%

 

Source: National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP), NHS Digital 

What else is happening? What else can be done?

Priorities around improving access to parks and green spaces, reducing loneliness and social isolation, hyper local community interventions showcasing services to improve health and wellbeing support and promote communities’ health and lifestyles. Partnerships between the local sport centres, GoParks, and community organisations can help encourage people to access sports, leisure and exercise activities. While the neighbourhood does not have a great amount of green space, the partnership has helped enable and encourage people to step out of their neighbourhood borders; build community cohesion and promote physical activity.

To address health inequalities and establish an environment that promotes and preserves good health, it is important to acknowledge that lifestyle factors are rooted in socioeconomic conditions. Bell Green and WEHM have an abundance of groups working in the area to provide support to residents. It is important to continue to address access to affordable; lowering risky behaviours by changing social norms and connecting people to peer support groups, such as encouraging them to use health check services, sexual health check services, stop smoking services and improving their access to drop-in sessions for psychological therapy and child clinics in the neighbourhood.